justification for being lazy
Been reading the book extract from "how to be idle". Some nice points made in the extract.
It is your patriotic duty to work hard - another myth, particularly convenient to the rich who, as Bertrand Russell said, "preach the dignity of labour, while taking care themselves to remain undignified in this respect". Or as the late, great British writer Jeffrey Bernard put it: "As if there was something romantic and glamorous about hard work ... if there was something romantic about it, the Duke of Westminster would be digging his own fucking garden, wouldn't he?"
The process of sitting or laying down and thinking something through always seems a bit strange to my family and a few of my colleagues. Physical activity does not necessarily translates to more productivity, and especially for programmers. I always distrust someone who immediately starts coding after hearing a project's specification.
most useless profession in the world
Last night I thought of a question. What do you think is the most useless profession in the world ? i.e. if all the members of that profession are wiped out, you would not notice a difference ?
The two professions that I could say can be wiped off safely are
- Models
- VJs
- Weatherman
- tanning salon owners
- vb coders - it is a useless profession, but if the vb coders disappeared, people would notice as things would start working.
- Astronauts - but a few people are of the opinion that being a astronaut is not a useless profession. My personal thought is, yes it is [a useless profession]. For space exploration, it is cheaper and better to send robots.
- politicians and lawyers. however people would notice both's departure.
- derivatives market trader? suit in general? middle manager?
- President of India
- queen of england and other royalty stuff - this I consider the moooost useless profession (can you even call it that ?).
I hear kids today aspiring to become a VJ .. I wish I would hear someone say (s)he want to become a sys admin/programmer someday .
Annexure
An interesting bit of conversation that occurred while discussing this question
lunatech: Q-FUNK, michel_v and ppl who answered my hypothetical question, consider the following answers, President of India, queen of england, and other royalty stuff Q-FUNK: lunatech, royalty is fine as long as it manages the transition to "rich bastard lving on their ancestor's assets" and stop being allowed to live off the population's taxes or off undue tax exemtions. lunatech: Q-FUNK, if they disappeared suddenly , will you notice the loss ? Q-FUNK: lunatech, I would not, as I'm not a Brit KevinMarks: Queen of England is a handy thing as she provides a sepration between pomp and politics travlin: yeah, you know, you can whip her out whenever you need a little pomp Suw: plus she keeps Buck House spick and span travlin: it's a just add water sort of thing travlin:
first comment
Congratulations to Teju for being the first to put his comment on my new blog. Thanks dude for being a good friend :smile: