evil yahoo chat rooms

Yesterday I logged into the yahoo chat rooms after a long time. Man, those guys lack the brains of a piece of rock. One guy kept repeating his question ("Is there anyone who works in the call center as technical support"). Another asshole sent me a personal message "hello, a/s/l plz". Frigging idiots. I cannot believe that at I was once addicted to Yahoo chat rooms. Needless to say, I am not going back to that stinkpile again. Ever.

most useless profession in the world

Last night I thought of a question. What do you think is the most useless profession in the world ? i.e. if all the members of that profession are wiped out, you would not notice a difference ?

The two professions that I could say can be wiped off safely are

• Models
• VJs
• Weatherman

After much deliberations I could think of nothing else. Like a good geek, I popped this question to one of my friends and he added another profession to the list Newsreaders. (He also added mother-in-law to the list, but I do not think it is a profession. Moreover, if she disappears suddenly, your wife (and consequently, you too) will notice it). Next I put this question in two IRC channels (#phpc, #joito) I frequent. The list now grew up a little

• tanning salon owners
• vb coders - it is a useless profession, but if the vb coders disappeared, people would notice as things would start working.
• Astronauts - but a few people are of the opinion that being a astronaut is not a useless profession. My personal thought is, yes it is [a useless profession]. For space exploration, it is cheaper and better to send robots.
• politicians and lawyers. however people would notice both's departure.
• derivatives market trader? suit in general? middle manager?
• President of India
• queen of england and other royalty stuff - this I consider the moooost useless profession (can you even call it that ?).

I hear kids today aspiring to become a VJ .. I wish I would hear someone say (s)he want to become a sys admin/programmer someday .

Annexure
An interesting bit of conversation that occurred while discussing this question

lunatech: Q-FUNK, michel_v and ppl who answered my hypothetical
question, consider the following answers, President of India, queen of
england, and other royalty stuff

Q-FUNK: lunatech, royalty is fine as long as it manages the transition
to "rich bastard lving on their ancestor's assets" and stop being
allowed to live off the population's taxes or off undue tax exemtions.

lunatech: Q-FUNK, if they disappeared suddenly , will you notice the
loss ?

Q-FUNK: lunatech,  I would not, as I'm not a Brit 

KevinMarks: Queen of England is a handy thing as she provides a
sepration between pomp and politics

travlin: yeah, you know, you can whip her out whenever you need a
little pomp

Suw: plus she keeps Buck House spick and span

travlin: it's a just add water sort of thing

travlin: 

back with new website

Been absent for almost 10 days now. Well do not write me off as yet. Been spending my time writing code, troubleshooting and generally beng lazy. I bought the rajshekhar.net domain name and have put up a website on it. :smile: I have also put up a blog at my new site, at rajshekhar.net/blog, using the excellent wordpress tool. You can syndicate my blog now.