Entries from My take on life

  • August, 2004
  • most useless profession in the world

    Last night I thought of a question. What do you think is the most useless profession in the world ? i.e. if all the members of that profession are wiped out, you would not notice a difference ?

    The two professions that I could say can be wiped off safely are

    • Models
    • VJs
    • Weatherman
    After much deliberations I could think of nothing else. Like a good geek, I popped this question to one of my friends and he added another profession to the list Newsreaders. (He also added mother-in-law to the list, but I do not think it is a profession. Moreover, if she disappears suddenly, your wife (and consequently, you too) will notice it). Next I put this question in two IRC channels (#phpc, #joito) I frequent. The list now grew up a little
    • tanning salon owners
    • vb coders - it is a useless profession, but if the vb coders disappeared, people would notice as things would start working.
    • Astronauts - but a few people are of the opinion that being a astronaut is not a useless profession. My personal thought is, yes it is [a useless profession]. For space exploration, it is cheaper and better to send robots.
    • politicians and lawyers. however people would notice both's departure.
    • derivatives market trader? suit in general? middle manager?
    • President of India
    • queen of england and other royalty stuff - this I consider the moooost useless profession (can you even call it that ?).

    I hear kids today aspiring to become a VJ .. I wish I would hear someone say (s)he want to become a sys admin/programmer someday :-) .

    Annexure
    An interesting bit of conversation that occurred while discussing this question

    lunatech: Q-FUNK, michel_v and ppl who answered my hypothetical
    question, consider the following answers, President of India, queen of
    england, and other royalty stuff
    
    Q-FUNK: lunatech, royalty is fine as long as it manages the transition
    to "rich bastard lving on their ancestor's assets" and stop being
    allowed to live off the population's taxes or off undue tax exemtions.
    
    lunatech: Q-FUNK, if they disappeared suddenly , will you notice the
    loss ?
    
    Q-FUNK: lunatech,  I would not, as I'm not a Brit ;-)
    
    KevinMarks: Queen of England is a handy thing as she provides a
    sepration between pomp and politics
    
    travlin: yeah, you know, you can whip her out whenever you need a
    little pomp
    
    Suw: plus she keeps Buck House spick and span
    
    travlin: it's a just add water sort of thing
    
    travlin: :-)
    

    Defined tags for this entry:
  • first comment

    Congratulations to Teju for being the first to put his comment on my new blog. Thanks dude for being a good friend :smile:

    Defined tags for this entry:
  • July, 2004
  • back with new website

    Been absent for almost 10 days now. Well do not write me off as yet. Been spending my time writing code, troubleshooting and generally beng lazy. I bought the rajshekhar.net domain name and have put up a website on it. :smile: I have also put up a blog at my new site, at rajshekhar.net/blog, using the excellent wordpress tool. You can syndicate my blog now.

    Defined tags for this entry:

Page 17 of 17, totaling 115 entries